The United States is now considering giving Ukraine powerful long-range missiles, Vice President JD Vance said, marking a possible shift in U.S. support in the war with Russia.
Reuters
+1

What Is Being Considered?

Vance revealed that Ukraine has asked the U.S. to supply Tomahawk cruise missiles, which can travel very long distances — potentially up to 2,500 km (about 1,550 miles).
Reuters
+2
The Washington Post
+2
If approved, such missiles would allow Ukraine to hit deep inside Russian territory, including possibly cities far from the war frontlines.
Reuters
+2
Reuters
+2

But Vance stressed nothing is final yet. He said President Trump will make the “final determination” on whether these missiles should be provided.
Reuters
+2
The Washington Post
+2

A Change in U.S. Approach?

This marks a shift from earlier U.S. policy. In the past, Trump’s administration had refused to let Ukraine strike deep into Russia using American-supplied long-range weapons.
CBS News
+3
The Washington Post
+3
Reuters
+3

But as the war continues and peace talks remain stagnant, frustration has grown in Washington over Russia’s unwillingness to negotiate. That may be pushing some officials to reconsider earlier limits on military aid.
The Kyiv Independent
+3
The Washington Post
+3
Reuters
+3

Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, a U.S. special envoy, suggested Ukraine should have “the ability to hit deep,” arguing there should be “no sanctuaries” for Russia.
Reuters
+3
The Washington Post
+3
CBS News
+3

Risks and Reactions

Russia has already warned that supplying such missiles would be an escalation. Kremlin officials questioned who would launch them and how targeting decisions would be made.
Reuters
+2
The Washington Post
+2

Some Russian voices claimed the missiles might not change the course of the war, while others warned that deeper strikes could broaden the conflict.
Reuters
+1

Many analysts warn supplying extremely long-range weapons carries risks. It could provoke retaliation or draw more countries into the conflict. There is also concern over the political and military balance, and whether Ukraine has capacity to safely employ such weapons.

What It Would Mean for Ukraine

If these missiles were approved and delivered, Ukraine would gain a powerful tool. It could strike strategic targets — bases, supply lines, or other military infrastructure — that are currently out of reach. This could change calculations on both sides of the war.

However, having the weapons is not enough. Ukraine would need proper intelligence, planning, training, and protection for missile launch units. Misuse or errors could have serious consequences.

Conclusion

Vice President Vance’s statements suggest the U.S. is seriously weighing a big step: equipping Ukraine with long-range Tomahawk missiles. That move, if approved by President Trump, would signal a more aggressive posture in U.S. support for Kyiv. But with risks of escalation and complex military challenges, the decision will not be easy. The world now waits to see whether this idea becomes policy — and how Russia, Ukraine, and other powers respond to this possible turning point in the conflict.